Future Home
What could our future home appliances be like?
How would the appliances be localized in China?
🤔️
#foundational research #evaluative research #crosscultural study #interview #concept testing #product innovation #home appliances
Background
The smart home appliances market is quickly growing, with the Asia-Pacific region as a dominant market*.
To innovate and create the next range of its product range, Bosch is conducting a global research project to understand the user needs of its target group.
This study specifically focuses on the Chinese market.
* According to BlueWave Consulting, the global smart home appliances market was worth USD 31.8 billion in the year 2021. The market is forecast to grow at a CAGR of 12.1%, earning revenue of around USD 73.1 billion by the end of 2028. The Asia-Pacific region dominates the smart home appliances market owing to the increasing disposable income of consumers and rising spending on smart home appliances. (source)
Getting the Request
The client came to us right before the holiday season, with a pretty urgent request (as the request was circulated and delegated among several agencies before us).
After confirming the bandwidth, I took the request, with awareness of the possible two challenges - (1) project management, on the project level, and (2) time management, on the personal level.
The Gantt Chart of the Project
For project management, I worked with my colleague (shout out to Zhe) and developed this Gantt Chart.
We identified the phases, the tasks at each stage, the deliverables, and the deadlines.
We used Lark to organize the Gantt chart and all the related materials.
My Project Calendar
For time management, I prioritized this project, and organized all the chats with participants and clients using Calendar and Things (a task management app). The progress is tracked on the Gantt Chart.
Recruiting
The main recruiting session took a week. However, since there are participants who opted out, the recruiting was actually spread across the whole process.
The Screening Survey
Bosch provided the screening with general criteria, screen-out criteria, and a specific screening survey with 18 questions.
Translate the Material. I translated the general screening from English to Chinese.
The Screening Survey
Modify the Material. In translation, I figured out some room to improve the screening to make it more fitted for the Chinese market. For example, one of the screening survey questions asks to screen out those who have never used the oven. However, in the Chinese market, the oven is still pretty rare, while appliances like steam cookers are more popular. I identified some of the issues and reached out to the clients to communicate the issues.
Develop the Survey. Further, I developed the screening survey using the Tencent surveying tool, a popular surveying platform in China.
Circulate the Survey. My colleague and I circulated the survey on social media and interest groups, anonymously, to avoid recruiting biases.
The Screening Call with the Qualified Participants
Select the Qualified Participants. Based on the survey responses, I selected ~20 qualified participants based on their responses and considering Bosch’s target group in China.
Leverage the Screening Call. To make sure that the participants are eloquent enough, I scheduled a 10 min call with the qualified participants before the main study.
The Participant Pool
#1 Study: Foundational Research
The goal of the foundational study is to understand people’s cooking and laundry experiences in the background of four trends (Trend A, Trend B, Trend C, Trend D), what do they like and dislike about the current cooking and laundry experiences, and how would people envision about the future experiences of cooking and laundry.
The way that I approach the problem is first by a pre-task survey, and second via an in-depth interview.
Pre-task Survey
Review the Goal. The goal of the pre-task survey is to understand the participants’ cooking and laundry experiences from a high level. After reviewing the survey responses, I could be more prepared and efficiently identify the paths to go within the further in-depth interviews.
Polish the Survey. Bosch drafted the original version of the pre-task survey. I reorganized the questions into a 3-part 6-page survey, to make sure that all the original questions are fully covered in a reasonable way.
Optimize the Process. The participants are expected to answer some questions and also upload some pictures of the current kitchen and laundry room, so that we can better understand how cooking and laundry are incorporated into their day-to-day life. Considering the capacity of the survey tool, I ask the participants to directly send the pictures of their current kitchen and laundry room to me, rather than upload them into the survey as suggested by Bosch. That direct communication also enables me to quickly follow up with the participants and ask them to take pictures that reveal more information - in other words, in this case, the de-automation increases the speed, minimizes the cost, and also boots the quality.
Interview
Review the Goal. The goal of the interview is to further understand people’s current cooking and laundry experience, and discover some unmet needs, and/or patterns. Each interview is expected to last ~60 minutes.
The Moderation Guide
Develop the Moderation Guide. Building on Bosch’s materials, I drafted the general moderation guide. Based on the pre-task survey responses, I drafted the individualized moderation guide. Each individualized guide is drafted with 1~3 focuses. For example, Bosch cares about how would cooking and laundry experiences would evolve with the four social trends; when drafting the moderation guide, I make sure that Trend A and Trend B would be reflected in Participant A’s lifestyle, while Trend C and Trend D in Participant B’s lifestyle. In this way, the four trends are covered thoroughly and equally.
Conduct the Interview. The interviews were conducted on Tencent Meeting because it is one of the most accessible meeting tools in China, and it is embedded well into Wechat - the communication channel of this study.
Delivery
Affinity Mapping. While data synthesis is not expected by our client, we provided a preliminary affinity mapping board (in English) to make sure that the main points, at least from the moderator’s perspective, are highlighted enough, especially in this cross-cultural study. The affinity mapping is conducted on Miro.
Develop the Poster. Besides the affinity mapping on the experience level and the trend level, I provided another version for our clients to quickly get an overview of the study: that is the individual poster. Each individual poster consists of the participant’s profile (image, age, profession, living condition), their cooking/laundry patterns, things they like/don’t like about cooking/laundry, and their ideal cooking/laundry experiences, combined with images to illustrate the points.
The Miro Board with Affinity Mapping and Individual Posters
Delegate the Work while Ensuring the Quality. The expected delivery is the translated interview recordings. Due to the bandwidth, we delegated the interview transcription and translation to a translation agency. During the process, I reviewed the two transcriptions, first in Chinese and second in English, to make sure its quality. Sometimes I also had to ask the agency to rework if some part was poorly done.
#2 Study: Evaluative Research
Four months after conducting the foundational study, we heard back from the client that they are conducting a follow-up project. That is, based on the insights from the foundational study, they have developed 8 concepts, and they would like to have the concepts tested by a small set of the same participants.
The goal of the evaluative research is to see how would people respond to the concepts, so that Bosch could further develop its innovation strategy and its specific products.
Recruiting
Reach out to the Participants. Bosch intended to conduct the concept testing with the same group of participants. I randomly selected 6 of the original 10 participants, shared what was going on, and asked if they would be willing to participate in the follow-up study. All 6 participants agreed to join. In fact, they are pretty happy to see that Bosch was following up based on their previous responses.
Concept Testing
Develop the Materials. Bosch provided the to-be-tested concepts, and suggested the test consist of a survey and a one-hundred-dollar test. The test is conducted in the form of a moderated interview.
My co-worker translated the material. Further, we created the Figma board combined with the 8 concepts and the survey.
Streamline the Process, and Visualize the Responses. As included in the concept testing, each participant is expected to read the image and the descriptions of each design, and then respond to 5 questions (e.g., “do you like it”, “is it clear“, “is it novel”, etc., on a 5 Likert scale) of each design, one by one. Then, from the 8 concepts, each participant is expected to pick the top 3 concepts and invest their 1 million USD. If we go that way without much preparation, it would be difficult for me to document the responses, and it would be difficult for the participants to recall their thoughts.
So, the Figma board is created to streamline the process. My co-worker and I developed 6 boards for each participant. The 8 concepts were randomized on each board to avoid bias. The survey was attached to each concept, so that I as the moderator could document the responses on live. In that visualized way, it is also easier for us to communicate and share insights with the clients.
Ask the Follow-up Questions. As participants respond to the survey and the one-hundred-dollar test, what matters is not their short answers, but the reasons behind their answers. I leveraged several techniques to ask follow-up questions, to make sure that we have dived deep into their rationale.
Engage Stakeholders. As planning the concept testing sessions, I shared the research calendar with my stakeholders. The client sat in on several sessions. In each session, before wrapping up, I asked if the client had further questions. After each live session, the client and I had a debrief session, where we discussed our observations. Further, as we identified some unclear parts during the session, the debrief session also enabled us to quickly discussed and aligned on the next steps.
Delivery
Again, Delegate the Work Wisely. Same as the first foundational study, we delegated the transcription and translation work to an agency. During the whole process, I had to make sure that the work was done with quality and speed.
Reflection
Delivery. Even though we got the first request right before the holiday season, my co-worker and I got this done and delivered to the client in 6 weeks, thanks to our seamless collaboration and all our supportive participants.
There was some back and forth between the client and I after the first delivery, mainly because of the cross-cultural background.
Several months later, the client went back to us and requested a follow-up study - that’s the moment I knew my previous work was recognized and I was granted a chance to do even better.
The follow-up project was conducted in 4 weeks. Besides conducting the project, my personal goal was to better communicate in a cross-cultural study. I proactively communicated with the client, invited the client to sit in on my interview sessions, had de-brief sessions with the client, and also shared my note with the client. All these efforts were well recognized by my manager and the clients.
Personal Growth. Besides the delivery, I also accumulated experiences regarding …
In terms of research craft
How to communicate in a cross-cultural study?
How to communicate if the request is unclear?
How to engage stakeholders (the client)?
How to build rapport with the participants?
How to effectively ask the question in the interview?
……
In terms of communication and collaboration
How to balance speed vs. quality?
How to communicate with a pissed-off participant?
How to collaborate with people in totally different personality?
How to handle the situation after you got something wrong?
How to deal with competing instructions/suggestions?
How to persuade your coworker if you have different opinions?
How to pitch your thoughts to your manager?
How to request a rework if the delivery is below expectation?
How to communicate if the client feels your work is below expectation?
……
Aren’t you curious about all these stories and my learnings?
Let’s chat!
Project Gallery